Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Improving Society Millââ¬â¢s On Liberty and Marxââ¬â¢s Communist...
Society is built and run on social and moral obligations and while these two are closely related, both impact cultures around the world in different ways. Marxââ¬â¢s Communist Manifesto and Millââ¬â¢s On Liberty demonstrate the relationship these obligations have with successful and unsuccessful social constructs. For the purposes of this paper, a moral obligation is a consideration of what is rightà ¬Ã ¬Ã ¬ and wrong and can vary depending on pressures from external sources such as religion, while a social obligation is a responsibility the individual has to act to benefit the best interests of their class as well as supporting the stability between society and the individual. Marx and Mill differ greatly in their opinions on the role and effects ofâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Since the Bourgeoisie control the means of production, their social obligations stem from the betterment of their own class by maintaining the status quo between themselves and the Proletariat, and to this end, the Bourgeoisie are continuously revolutionizing the modes of production so that the workers are constantly dependent on them. Marxââ¬â¢s views of social obligation differ from Millââ¬â¢s in that by Marxââ¬â¢s view, there are two classes with their own social agendas and obligations to their own class, whereas Millââ¬â¢s idea is that all members of a society should act in a way that brings about the most benefit for everyone, without causing harm to others. Marx shows that there is a split in advancement of society due to self-interest since the Bourgeoisie is trying maintain the status quo when he says that there is ââ¬Å"Constant revolutionizing of productionsâ⬠and ââ¬Å"uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditionsâ⬠(Marx 12), while the Proletariat is trying to break the status quo. Mill on the other hand believes advancement comes from the expression and discussion of all opinions, even those that donââ¬â¢t represent the favor of the majority. In addition to differences in social responsibilities, Marx and Mill contradict each other in regard to social tyranny because in Marxââ¬â¢s Communism, the social obligation introduced by the self-interest of the majority of would coerce the working class into
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.